You asked the community to support you for the parachain slot now that you have it you just announce a rebrand? Yesterday: DID, today: CAS tomorrow: whatever buzz word you come up with in the future? Identity HUB means Litentry changes it's identity whenever they want? Identity fluid?

[@46vZ...S2sk](46vZuio28YbqsdGHPB7S763p18cFSxoUqi4vd7jGURYUS2sk-litentry) It looks like this rebrand is not bonded with parachain slot topic. Actually parachain slot is going to be deprecated according to Polkadot. Polkadot is promoting CoreTime. On the other hand, personally I think the team is doing something good for my LIT investment. I will vote for it.

[@4BS1...uVDq](4BS18R6TNma4FDwDZyFuwWDxnanGPMyYYzuuZ6JoJYsTuVDq-litentry)  Maybe it's my fault but my message wasn't about parachains. The problem is there is a crowd funded company who asked people to invest into their lemonade stand but after awhile their company's worth much less so they think they "rebrand" to sell hotdogs. Investors try to run after their money I get it. Litentry had something unique imo at least on paper. Now they will just follow the mainstream. From what I saw from them the click here a hundred times (a dozen times a day) and you will have a chance to win a discount of a thing you need to buy for real money (sounds very much like the scams ask you to pay x amount of money and you will get y later just be patient) that is of course when the page didn't throw you an error message. Or you can win points to get a few ranks to get better chance on the next occasion. Is this a serious business practice? I don't see any sign that it will be greater success with a rebrand. With this they admit their whole concept was a failure. I don't trust them anymore and in my experience this type of rebrand didn't change the course of any crypto company in the past. It's just a clear sign that they lack concept. And yes Polkadot is before a huge change but we all know that is just an excuse for Litentry. ID was a buzz word when they started now it isn't. Since they didn't really build anything complex it's easy for them to jump ship to start something else. Anyway after this I lost my faith in them and will exchange my tokens to another project as soon as I can.

Please refer to this [medium article](https://litentry.medium.com/embracing-the-future-litentrys-journey-to-chain-abstraction-services-2311a9b0ef80) for the context.

To underscore the change: DID and ChainAbstraction are two connected concepts. We try to embed the DID service that we've already built into a bigger infrastructure framework, so it should be seen as an extension instead of an orthogonal shift.

This motion(referendum) is used to record LIT holders' opinions towards this move, it's a stategic vote, thus the execution result is just a `system.remark`

Litentry is making changes to its infrastructure framework by embedding the DID service they have already built into it. This is not a big shift but an extension. 
They are using a referendum to record LIT holders' opinions towards this move. 
The referendum is a strategic vote and the result will be a system remark.

#44·Vote for Litentry's strategic move: from DID to Chain Abstraction